Dapper vs Entity Framework Core – Which One Should You Use in .NET?

Choosing the right data access strategy is a critical architectural decision in any .NET application. Two of the most widely used options are Dapper and Entity Framework Core (EF Core).

This article provides a detailed comparison covering performance, architecture, scalability, maintainability, and real-world usage scenarios.

---

Understanding the Core Difference

The primary difference between Dapper and EF Core lies in the level of abstraction they provide.

• Dapper is a micro ORM that offers minimal abstraction and maximum control.
• EF Core is a full ORM focused on developer productivity and maintainability.

This distinction impacts performance, development speed, and long-term scalability.

---

What is Dapper?

Dapper is a lightweight object mapper that works directly with raw SQL queries. It extends IDbConnection and maps query results to C# objects with very little overhead.

How Dapper Works

• Executes raw SQL
• No change tracking
• No state management
• Minimal abstraction over ADO.NET

Advantages of Dapper

• Extremely fast query execution
• Low memory usage
• Full control over SQL
• Excellent for read-heavy systems

Disadvantages of Dapper

• Manual SQL for every operation
• No built-in migrations
• Complex relationships require extra effort
• Higher maintenance for large systems

---

What is Entity Framework Core?

Entity Framework Core is a full-featured ORM that allows developers to interact with databases using C# classes and LINQ instead of writing SQL directly.

How EF Core Works

• Tracks entity state changes
• Converts LINQ expressions into SQL
• Manages relationships automatically
• Supports migrations and schema evolution

Advantages of EF Core

• Rapid application development
• Clean domain-driven design
• Automatic change tracking
• Strong tooling support
• Easier onboarding for new developers

Disadvantages of EF Core

• Performance overhead
• Higher memory consumption
• Generated SQL can be inefficient for complex queries

---

Performance Comparison

Aspect	Dapper	EF Core
Query Speed	Very Fast	Moderate
Memory Usage	Low	High
Development Speed	Medium	Fast
SQL Control	Full	Limited

---

Maintainability and Scalability

Dapper

• Explicit SQL improves transparency
• Schema changes require manual updates
• Harder to maintain in large codebases

EF Core

• Centralized domain models
• Automatic migrations
• Easier refactoring
• Better suited for large teams

---

Real-World Use Cases

Use Dapper When

• Building high-traffic Web APIs
• Creating reporting or analytics systems
• Performance is critical
• Applications are read-heavy

Use EF Core When

• Developing admin panels
• Working on business applications
• Rapid development is required
• Handling complex relationships

---

Recommended Hybrid Approach

In production-grade applications, the best approach is often to use both tools together.

• Use EF Core for standard CRUD and domain logic
• Use Dapper for complex and performance-critical queries

This hybrid model delivers both performance and maintainability.

---

Code Examples

Dapper Example

var users = connection.Query<User>(
    "SELECT Id, Name, Email FROM Users WHERE IsActive = 1"
).ToList();

Entity Framework Core Example

var users = await _context.Users
    .Where(u => u.IsActive)
    .Select(u => new UserDto
    {
        Id = u.Id,
        Name = u.Name,
        Email = u.Email
    })
    .ToListAsync();

---

Final Verdict

There is no single winner.

Dapper excels at performance and control, while Entity Framework Core excels at productivity and maintainability.

The most effective .NET applications use the right tool for the right scenario.